Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3533 of 2019 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12864 of 2018 ====================================================== 1.
Kundan Kumar, age about 26 years (M), Son of Mahendra Singh Resident of Village- Parariya, P.O. Patluka, P.S.- Barachatti, District Gaya 2.
Shravan Kumar Paswan, Male, 29 years, son of Ram Chandra Paswan Resident of Village-Barandi, P.O. Malua, P.S.- Barachatti, District Gaya 3.
Punit Kumar Yadavendu, 26 years, Male, son of Banwari Yadav R/o VillageHardawan, P.O. Hardawan, P.S. Dobhi, District Gaya 4.
Sajid Ahmad, 27 years, Male, Son of Faiyaz Ahmad R/o Village-Srirampur, P.O. Srirampur, P.S. Sherghati, District Gaya 5.
Sajid Ahmad, 27 years, Male, son of Faiyaz Ahmad R/o Village-Srirampur, P.O. Srirampur, P.S. Sherghati, District Gaya 6.
Ram Swaroop Paswan, 28 years, Male, Son of Ramdas Paswan R/o VillageChapi, P.O. Srirampur, P.S. Sherghati, District Gaya 7.
Karu Paswan, 29 years, Male, Son of Mungeshar Paswan Resident of Village-Nima, P.O. Mohabbatpur, P.S. Sherghati, District Gaya 8.
Vipani Kumar, 27 years, Male, son of Rajo Singh Resident of Village Dhangao, P.O. Fatehpur, P.S. Fatehpur, District Gaya 9.
Sunil Kumar, 25 years, Male, son of Battu Paswan Resident of VillageJahagira, P.O. Barachatti, P.S. Mohanpur, District Gaya 10.
Sanullah, 29 years, Male, Son of Enul Khan Resident of Village-Baju Khurd, P.O. Barachatti, P.S. Barachatti, District Gaya 11.
Manish Kumar Paswan, 28 years, Male, Son of Late Banwari Paswan Resident of Village-Pratapi, P.O. Barachatti, P.S. Barachatti, District Gaya 12.
Vinod Yadav, 32 years, Male, Son of Chamari Yadav Resident of VillageSondiha, P.O. Sherghati, P.S. Sherghati, District Gaya 13.
Manoj Kumar Paswan, 28 years, Male, Son of Shyam Sundar Paswan Resident of Village Rebada, P.O. Patluka, P.S. Barachatti, District Gaya 14.
Ravindra Kumar, 31 years, Male, son of Sitaram Paswan Resident of Village Ambatari, P.O. Ambatari, P.S. Mohanpur, District Gaya 15.
Dharmendra Kumar, 30 years, Male, son of Jhakhar Paswan Resident of Villafge-Parariya, P.O. Patluka, P.S. Barachatti, District Gaya 16.
Pradeep Kumar Paswan, 27 years, Male, Son of Feku Paswan Resident of Village-Chuabar, P.O. Pamaniya, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 17.
Kamlesh Paswan, 26 years, Male, Son of Chandradeo Paswan Resident of Village-Sinhapur, P.O. Maigara, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 18.
Baliram Paswan, 33 years, Male, Son of Brahamdeo Paswan Resident of Village-Bagahi, P.O. Raniganj, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 19.
Uday Paswan, 25 years, Male, son of Vijay Paswan Resident of VillageBardih, P.O. Malhari, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 20.
Sanjay Paswan, 27 years, Male, son of Andhi Paswan Resident of Village-
Patna High Court MJC No.3533 of 2019(3) dt.11-11-2020 2/3 Nawakhap, P.O. Nagwapsara, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 21.
Awadh Kishore, 29 years, Male, Paswan Son of Dwarika Paswan Resident of Village-Bhatbigha, P.O. Nagwapsara, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 22.
Sadil Kha, 25 years, Male, son of Md. Nasir Kha R/o Village-Samsabad, P.O. Maigara, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 23.
Wakil Khan, 27 years, Male, son of Jamil Khan R/o Village-Samsabad, P.O. Maigara, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 24.
Rajesh Kumar, 27 years, Male, Son of Mohan Ram Resident of VillageChuabar, P.O. Imamganj, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 25.
Shambhu Paswan, 28 years, Male, Son of Jag Mohan Paswan Resident of Village-Kosama, P.O. Ghoraghat, P.S. Dobhi, District Gaya 26.
Satish Kumar, 26 years, Male, son of Rajendra Tripathi Resident of VillageAmarul, P.O. Amarul, P.S. Dobhi, District Gaya 27.
Sudarshan Kumar, 26 years, Male, son of Ganpati Kurmi Resident of Village-Ghoraghat, P.O. Ghoraghat, P.S. Dobhi, District Gaya 28.
Ramadhesh Kumar, 25 years, Male, son of Mungeshwar Gope Resident of Village-Singh Pokhar, P.O. Dobhi, P.S. Dobhi, District Gaya 29.
Akhilesh Paswan, 30 years, Male, Son of Lalji Paswan Resident of Village Baseta, P.O. Malhari, P.S. Imamganj, District Gaya 30.
Vijay Prasad Yadav, 25 years, Male, son of Ramdeo Yadav Resident of Village-Kahudag, P.O. Barachatti, P.S. Barachatti, District Gaya 31.
Mukesh Kumar, 24 years, Male, Son of Late Rajendra Paswan R/o Village Kewala Tola, Tintarwa, P.O. Ambatari, P.S. Mohanpur, District Gaya 32.
Ram Chhapit Paswan, 23 years, Male, Son of Shivbrat Paswan R/o Village Biwi Pasera, P.O. Diwaniya, P.S. Barachatti, District Gaya 33.
Shankar Yadav, 23 years, Male, son of Govind Gope R/o Village Nagar Sitalpur, P.O. Gatahpur, P.S. Fatehpur, District Gaya 34.
Sudama Kumar, 22 years, Male, son of Rameshwar Yadav R/o Village Nagar Bhare, P.O. Fatehpur, P.S. Fatehpur, District Gaya 35.
Vinay Kumar, 26 years, Male, son of Mohan Gope R/o Village Fatehpur, P.O. Fatehpur, P.S. Gatehpur, District Gaya 36.
Mukesh Paswan, 25 years, Male, Son of Arjun Dusadh R/o Village-Tolaya, P.O. Fatehpur, P.S. Fatehpur, District Gaya 37.
Ranjit Kumar, 26 years, Male, son of Kapildeo Paswan R/o Village Dharhara Kala, P.O. Fatehpur, P.S. Fatehpur, District Gaya 38.
Vinay Paswan, 23 years, Male, son of Dashrath Paswan R/o Village Goli, P.O. Fatehpur, P.S. Fatehpur, District Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna 2.
The Secretary cum Commissioner Home (Police) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna 3.
The Deputy Secretary Home (Police) Department, Bihar, Patna
Patna High Court MJC No.3533 of 2019(3) dt.11-11-2020 3/3 4.
The Finance Department through the Finance Secretary cum Commissioner, Government of Bihar, Patna 5.
The District Magistrate, Gaya ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Ms.Rekha Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Nadim Seraj (GP 5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-11-2020 Heard Ms. Rekha Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner and Md. Nadim Seraj, GP5 representing the State assisted by Mr. Shailesh Kumar, AC to GP5.
The present application has been filed for restoration of C.W.J.C. No. 12864 of 2018 which was dismissed for default due to non-compliance of the order dated 27.7.2018 by which three weeks pre-emptory time was granted to the petitioners to remove the defects pointed out by the Stamp Reporter. This Court is satisfied with the reasons given in this restoration application and, accordingly, the prayer made for restoration of C.W.J.C. No. 12864 of 2018 is allowed with a liberty to the petitioners to remove the defects within a period of six weeks after restoration of the normal court proceedings. Accordingly, this restoration application stands allowed. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U