Avinash Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.18300 of 2015 Arising Out of Complaint Case No. -971 Year- 2014 District- WESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ====================================================== Avinash Kumar Son of Sri Amarnath Prasad resident of Jhauganj, In front of Gurudwara, P.S. Chowk, District - Patna .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Jyoti Devi Wife of Sri Avinash Kumar, daughter of Sri Om Prakash Sarraf resident of Jhauganj, P.S. Chowk In front of Gurudwara, District - Patna At present resident of Naya Bazar Bettiah, P.S. + P.O. Bettiah Nagar, District - West Champaran .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Sharma, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Anzarul Haque Sahara, A.P.P. CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-06-2015 The petitioner apprehends his arrest in relation to Complaint Case No. 971(c) of 2014 registered under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is the husband and is being prosecuted by his wife for offences punishable under Sections 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, shortly after the marriage.
The informant is represented in the Court and states that she is ready to live with the husband, provided he keeps her with dignity. The petitioner is also ready to keep her provided she lives in her matrimonial house and keeps her in-laws with proper care and dignity. He submits that the only reason, this litigation has
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18300 of 2015 (2) dt.11-06-2015 2/2 taken place, is because of the fact that the informant is not ready to live in the matrimonial house and serve the in-laws. Be that as it may, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the court below within four weeks from today, let the petitioner, namely, Avinash Kumar be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in connection with Complaint Case No. 971(c) of 2014, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J.) Vats/- U T