Bachandeo Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61332 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-141 Year-2024 Thana- HARPUR District- Munger ====================================================== Bachandeo yadav S/o- Late Sushil Yadav Village- Balbihma Ps- Harpur DistMunger ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

Mr. Kumar Kamal Nayan, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Ram Naresh Ray, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-12-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 3(5) and 61(2) of the B.N.S..

3. As per prosecution case, informant alleged that on 01.12.2024, on account of land dispute, all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including this petitioner, killed his father by strangulating and stabbing him with knife while he was sleeping at the doorstep of his house.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61332 of 2025(5) dt.03-12-2025 2/3 committed no offence. Informant is not an eye witness to the occurrence. In the F.I.R., informant has not disclosed as to how and who gave this information about involvement of this petitioner in the alleged occurrence. During course of investigation, none of the witnesses have claimed to have seen this petitioner committing the alleged offence. Petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case merely on suspicion on account of previous land dispute. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, materials that have surfaced during course of investigation and clean antecedents of the petitioner, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioner is allowed.

7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M.-1st Class, Munger in connection with Harpur P.S. Case No. 141A of 2024, subject to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61332 of 2025(5) dt.03-12-2025 3/3 condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T