Mukesh Kumar Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.7032 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -101 Year- 2015 Thana -NAWINAGAR District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Mukesh Kumar Mehta, son of Late Suresh Mehta, Resident of VillageKoiri Dih, P.O.- Naur, P.S.- Navinagar, District- Aurangabad. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyendra Prasad (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 02/ 16-02-2016 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to make necessary correction in the petition. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that Purushottam Paswan and the petitioner persuaded the informant to give rupees three lakhs each for providing two sons of the informant employment in the railway, consequently Rs.2,60,000/- was deposited in the account of the accused persons. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that no money was deposited in the account of the petitioner. Statement has been made in paragraph 3 of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.7032 of 2016 (2) dt.16-02-2016 2/2 petition that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is further submitted that if any money is deposited in the account of the petitioner then petitioner is ready to return the money. Considering the nature of accusation and submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, let the above named petitioner be released on anticipatory bail provisionally for three months, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad in connection with Navinagar P.S. Case No. 101 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

The learned court below will get the matter verified. If it is found that any amount was deposited by the informant in the account of the petitioner then the petitioner will surrender and pray for regular bail, but it is found that no amount was deposited in the account of the petitioner then the provisional bail will be confirmed by the learned court below.