Patna High CourtCR. MISC./71800/2024bail granted

Rajniti Yadav @ Netajee @ Rajniti Kumar @ Rajnitik Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-10-21Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.71800 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2024 Thana- Sarbahada District- Gaya ====================================================== Rajniti Yadav @ Netajee @ Rajniti Kumar @ Rajnitik Yadav Son of Late Shiv Yadav Resident of Mohalla- Sarbahada, Ward No. 9, P.S.- Sarbahada, Distt.- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aryan Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Narendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-10-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Sarabhada P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the petitioner assaulted the informant on his head by means of pasli due to which he sustained injury.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.71800 of 2024(2) dt.21-10-2024 2/2 possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that there is inordinate delay of seven days in lodging the FIR. Petitioner is the sole accused in this case. The injury found on the body of the informant is simple in nature caused by hard and blunt substance. The petitioner is in custody since 24.06.2024 and has got two criminal antecedents.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sarabhada P.S. Case No. 23 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T