Dr. Imran Khurshed @ Imran Khurshed v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.5704 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- SIWAN ======================================================

1. Dr. Imran Khurshed @ Imran Khurshed son of Dr. Khursheed Alam, resident of M.M. Colony, P.S. Siwan Town, District- Siwan .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harsh Anuj For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Narendra Kr. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 13-05-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Siwan Mahila P.S. Case No. 200 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 353 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that earlier case No. 199 of 2015 had been lodged against one Rahimullah Khan and Amir Khan. In the said case, the informant had been protesting against the unbecoming behaviour of Rahimullah Khan. Another accused and his maternal grandfather have been arrested. It was in furtherance and as a consequence of arrest of Rahimullah Khan that the informant of the present case,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.5704 of 2016 (3) dt.13-05-2016 2/2 who is the S.H.O, Mahila, Police Station, Siwan has received certain threats from the telephone number of the present petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a respectable Doctor and has nothing to do with the earlier case. In fact, since he came to know that his phone number which he has inadvertently left on the table, has been used by someone, possibly, Amir Khan, who was present on that occasion and misused the mobile of the petitioner. It is further submitted that for no fault of his, the petitioner is being prosecuted.

Considering the nature of allegation made that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner, in the event of his arrest / surrender within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the each amount to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 200 of 2015, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjana Mishra, J) ajaypd./- U T