Bhim Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6574 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -29 Year- 2013 Thana -MALAYPUR District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Bhim Yadav Son of Mural Yadav, Resident of Village - Mircha P.S. - Sikandra District - Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : M/S.Vikramdeo Singh & Shaukat Alam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pranav Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAVANITI PRASAD SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-04-2016 Heard.

The petitioner renews his prayer for bail. He is an accused in a case under sections 364, 302 and 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code in relation to Malaypur P.S. Case No. 29/2013. It is not in dispute that upon the confessional statement of the petitioner, the dead body of the kidnapped person was recovered. In view of the aforesaid, I am not inclined to reconsider the matter.

Learned counsel points out that two other co-accused have been granted bail by this Court. I have perused those orders. Those two accused persons were named by this petitioner in his confessional statement; otherwise there is no material against them. That is why this Court was persuaded to grant them bail.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6574 of 2016 (3) dt.06-04-2016 2/2 The case is clearly distinguishable.

The application is rejected. Let the trial be expedited. (Navaniti Prasad Singh, J) B.K.Roy/- U