Sunil Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.77761 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2018 Thana- GAIGHAT District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Singh Son of Laxaman Singh Resident of Village- Jarangdih, P.S.- Gaighat, District- Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sri Jai Narain Thakur ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Gaighat P.S. Case No. 258 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 25(1b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act. Informant is the Police Officer who has alleged that while vehicle checking, car of the petitioner was stopped and on search one loaded pistol was recovered from the possession of petitioner and he could not produce the ownership papers of the car.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. The said car belongs to his uncle and the necessary ownership papers is with him. He has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77761 of 2018(2) dt.03-01-2019 2/2 05.08.2018.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Judge 16th -cum- A.C.J.M. 15th, Muzaffarpur in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No. 258 of 2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/manojU T