Suddu @ Vimal Dubey @ Vimal Jee v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.65099 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2024 Thana- LACHHUAR District- Jamui ====================================================== Suddu @ Vimal Dubey @ Vimal jee Son of Chandrika Bajpayee R/O Vill.- Sabalbigha, P.S.- Lachhuar, Dist.- Jamui ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nishant Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 09-09-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 324, 353 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 37 of the Bihar Excise Act.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that he received an information regarding a clash between two parties resulting in injuries to several individuals from both the groups and the occurrence was related to a previous case and despite all attempts to resolve the issues through a Panchayat, it ended in violence, but then the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature as would manifest from the order impugned and a joint compromise petition has also been filed by the parties as

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.65099 of 2024(2) dt.09-09-2024 2/2 recorded in the order impugned.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Lachhuar P.S. Case No. 106 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. However, it is made clear that the learned Trial Court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in the event if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of even one case in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T