← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./6348/2016bail granted

Rabindra Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2016-02-26Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.6348 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -263 Year- 1998 Thana -BARAUNI District- BEGUSARAI ====================================================== Rabindra Kumar Son of Late Bindeshwari Rai Resident of VillagePhaphaut, Police Station- Khodawandpur, in the district of Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prabhu Narayan Sharma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-02-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Barauni (Chakia) P.S. Case No. 263 of 1998 registered for offences under section 279/337 and 427 of the Indian Penal Code.

This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail. Earlier the petitioner was granted bail and later on the petitioner did not attend the court. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that now he will regularly attend the court without any fail. Looking to the entire fact and circumstances of the case as also the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner will regularly attend the court without any fail, let the petitioner, namely, Rabindra Kumar, be released

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6348 of 2016 (2) dt.26-02-2016 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Begusarai in connection with Baruni (Chakia) P.S. Case No. 263 of 1998 (G.R. No. 2058 of 1998) subject to the condition that one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

It is made clear that in the event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates either personally or through his counsel, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T