Guddu Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.78615 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2325 Year-2017 Thana- KATIHAR COMPLAINT CASE District- Katihar ====================================================== Guddu Yadav, S/o Jageshwar Yadav @ Ghailu Yadav, Resident of VillagePranpur, P.S. Pranpur, District Katihar. ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State Of Bihar, 2.
Khushboo Kumari, D/o Sukumar Yadav, R/o- Gogara, P.S. Azamnagar, District Katihar.
... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Md. Ashlam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 01-05-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 2325 of 2017, registered under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The accusation is of torturing of complainant due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry and also removing her from the matrimonial house after snatching her personal belongings.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, admittedly, the petitioner is the husband of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.78615 of 2018(5) dt.01-05-2019 2/2 complainant/O.P. No.2, and he is ready to keep the complainant/O.P. No.2 with full dignity, but complainant/O.P. No.2 does not want to live with the petitioner. Further submission is that petitioner has filed Matrimonial Case No. 60 of 2017 for restitution of his conjugal right on 13.12.2017 in the court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Katihar. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the S.D.J.M. Katihar in connection with Complaint Case No. 2325 of 2017, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T