Arbind Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.77991 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-454 Year-2018 Thana- KUDRA District- Bhabhua (Kaimur) ====================================================== Arbind Singh S/o Late Rajendra Singh, R/o Vill.- Bartalla Muhalla, P.S.- Kudra , District- Kaimur at Bhabua.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Uday Pratap Singh For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Parmanand Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 08-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Kudra P.S. Case No. 454 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 16.2 litres of foreign liquor from the Tempo of which petitioner is driver. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he plies the Tempo and some passenger had left it and he has been arrested on suspicion only. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 18.10.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.77991 of 2018(2) dt.08-01-2019 2/2 (Excise), Kaimur at Bhabua, in connection with Kudra P.S. Case No. 454 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U