Amit Kumar Mishra @ Amit Mishra @ Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6301 of 2016 (4) dt.06-04-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.6301 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -627 Year- 2015 Thana -MUFFASIL DistrictWESTCHAMPARAN(BETTIAH) ======================================================
1. Amit Kumar Mishra @ Amit Mishra @ Amit Kumar S/o Nawal Kishore Mishra, Resident of Village- Belwa, P.S. Bettiah Muffasil District- West Champaran ..... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ram Sewak Chaudhary(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 06-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 627 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394/34 of the Indian Penal Code which was converted into Sections 395/216 of the Indian Penal Code later on.
Allegedly, three motorcycle borne criminals surrounded the informant and after assaulting with knife and breaking the dickey of the motorcycle of the informant took away bag containing ornaments. During investigation the name of the petitioner transpired in Chanpatiya P.S. Case No. 284 of 2015 and from the house of Prince Kumar arms was also recovered. Submission is of false implication and that the petitioner
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.6301 of 2016 (4) dt.06-04-2016 is in custody since 09.12.2015 but he has not been put on test identification parade, nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession and only on the basis of alleged confessional statement he is in custody and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration.
Learned APP after going through the case diary fairly submits that besides confession in another case there is no other material but the petitioner has criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 627 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.
(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T