Krishnawati Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.78938 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-394 Year-2017 Thana- MAJHAULIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Krishnawati Devi W/o Langatu Yadav, resident of village- Kehsoavan, P.S.- Majhaulaia, District- West Champaran.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sanjeev Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Ataur Rahman ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 25-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 394 of 2017 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is of killing the daughter of the informant due to non fulfillment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that she has committed no offence and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that the petitioner is the Mother-in-Law of the deceased and living separately. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 04.09.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78938 of 2018(2) dt.25-01-2019 2/2 the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate-Bettiah, West Champaran, in connection with Majhaulia P.S. Case No. 394 of 2017, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his/her absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his/her bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U