← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/16392/2022dismissed

Nipu Kumari @ Nipu Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-05Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16392 of 2022 ====================================================== Nipu Kumari @ Nipu Devi Wife of Shashi Paswan, Resident of VillageGhorpakri P.S.- Inarwa District- West Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar Patna. 2.

The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Social Welfare Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

The Director, Integrated Child Development Services (ICDS) Scheme, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The Commissioner-cum Appellate Authority, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur. 6.

The District Magistrate, West Champaran.

7.

The District Programme Officer (Social), I.C.D.S. District- West Champaran.

8.

The Child Development Project Officer (CDPO) Mainatand, West Champaran.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Sushmita Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Prashant Pratap (Gp2) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 05-04-2024

1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following relief(s):- "1. That by this application, the petitioner is invoking the writ jurisdiction of this Hon'ble Court:- For the issuance of a rule in the nature of writ of Mandamus commanding Respondent No. 6, the District Magistrate, West Champaran to dispose of R.M. Case No.

09/2020 at the earliest which has been

Patna High Court CWJC No.16392 of 2022(2) dt.05-04-2024 2/2 remanded to Respondent No. 6 by Respondent No. 5, The Commissioner-cum Appellate Authority, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur vide order dated 29-05-2020 passed by Respondent No. 5 in I.C.D.S. Appeal Case No. 269/2019 and is pending with Respondent No. 6 since last more than 2 years."

2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the respondent-State has submitted that since the appeal, filed by the petitioner has already stood rejected by an order dated 20.06.2023, the present writ petition has been rendered infructuous, hence the present writ petition be disposed off.

3. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Saurav/- U