Shrawan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.78366 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-288 Year-2018 Thana- RAMGARH District- Bhabhua (Kaimur) ====================================================== Shrawan Kumar, Son of Sri Ram Pyare Prasad, Resident of Village- Bandipur, P.S.- Ramgarh, District- Kaimur (Bhabua).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Yogendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sri Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 07-01-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 288 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Section 414 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation is of recovery of stolen motorcycle from the possession of petitioner.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 05.11.2018.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.78366 of 2018(2) dt.07-01-2019 2/2 Judicial Magistrate-1st, Bhabua (Kaimur) in connection with Ramgarh P.S. Case No. 288 of 2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U