Budhan Tuddu @ Chhotu Tuddu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57788 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2019 Thana- CHAKAI District- Jamui ====================================================== 1.

Budhan Tuddu @ Chhotu Tuddu, Son of Thena Tuddu, Resident of Village - Gadi (Gaganpur), P.S.- Chakai, Distt - Jamui. 2.

Ratan Tuddu, Son of Sufal Tuddu, Resident of Village - Gadi (Gaganpur), P.S.- Chakai, Distt - Jamui.

3.

Kailu Marandi, Son of Manjhala Marandi, Resident of Village - Gadi (Gaganpur), P.S.- Chakai, Distt - Jamui.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rabindra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Jaishankar Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Umesh Lal Verma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-10-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioners are in custody since 17.03.2019 in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No.45 of 2019 registered for the offence under Sections 147, 149, 341, 342, 333, 307, 353, 120B, 121, 121A, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)A, 26, 27,35 of the Arms Act and Section 3/5 of the Explosive Substances Act and Sections 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 of the U.A.P. Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that only on the basis of suspicion that the present petitioners are

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57788 of 2019(2) dt.14-10-2019 2/2 naxali elements, the petitioners were stopped on the way and they were taken into custody. It is further submitted that the present petitioners have nothing to do with the naxali movement nor any incriminating article has been recovered from the possession of the petitioners. It is further submitted that the petitioners were taken into custody on the basis of suspicion and there is no eye-witness to the said occurrence. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned counsel for the State and in view of the fact that these petitioners have no criminal antecedents, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-III, Jamui, in connection with Chakai P.S. Case No.45 of 2019. (Anjana Mishra, J) PNM U T