Gobind Mandal v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31671 of 2017 (4) dt.15-09-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31671 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -601 Year- 2016 Thana -KANKARBAGH District- PATNA ======================================================
1. Gobind Mandal Son of Bayash Mandal, Resident of Village- Madhubani Sarsho Pahi, P.S.- Sarsho Pahi, District- Madhubani. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Subhash Kumar Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 15-09-2017 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
This application, for grant of anticipatory bail, arises out of Kankarbagh Police Station Case No. 601 of 2016, disclosing offences under Sections 324, 307, 504, 506 and 54 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against this petitioner and no specific overt act is attributed to him. In fact, the petitioner happens to be brother-in-law of the informant and he is living separately from informant. As a matter of fact, this case is the counter version of Kankarbagh P.S. Case No. 599 of 2016. Hence, the petitioner also deserves the privilege of anticipatory
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31671 of 2017 (4) dt.15-09-2017 bail.
Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail and submitted that the petitioner along with one Manoj Mandal poured petrol on the body of the informant and set fire in order to kill the informant.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant the privilege of anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of this petitioner is rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T