Sakaldeo Ram v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57499 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2016 Thana- MADHUBAN District- East Champaran ====================================================== SAKALDEO RAM S/o Late Bhadai Ram R/o village- Jogolia Nandi Ram Chhapra, P.S.- Madhuban, District- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Alok Kumar @ Alok Kr Shahi For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Veena Rani Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 78 of 2016 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304(B), 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner had earlier moved this Court for regular bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 79131 of 2018 which was rejected on 20.02.2019 with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completing one year in custody.

It has been submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 13.07.2018.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57499 of 2019(2) dt.11-09-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned 14th Addl. Sessions Judge, East Champaran, Motihari, in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No. 78 of 2016 subject to the conditions that:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason the trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) veena/- U T