Santosh Sah @ Mukesh Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31911 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -74 Year- 2017 Thana -SHAMBHUGANJ District- BANKA ======================================================
1. Santosh Sah @ Mukesh Sah Son of Naresh Sah Resident of VillageKhangah,P.s. Shambhuganj, District- Banka. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Brij Nandad Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in Shambhuganj P.S. Case No. 74 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section354(B) of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that on the date of occurrence, the petitioner attempted to misbehave with the informant. The informant raised alarm.
As such, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner.
Accordingly, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed it is ordered that the petitioner named above, in the event of his arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31911 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Shambhuganj P.S. Case No. 74 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T