Patna High CourtCR. MISC./32980/2017rejected

Baso Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-21Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.32980 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -82 Year- 2017 Thana -BAHERA District- DARBHANGA ======================================================

1. Baso Paswan, Son of Sumrit Paswan. null

2. Indal Paswan, Son of Baso Paswan.

3. Bindeshwar Paswan, Son of Bihru Paswan.

4. Birendar Paswan, S/o Ram Chandar Paswan.

5. Kitab Paswan, S/o Ram Lochan Paswan.

6. Sanjay Paswan, S/o Dilip Paswan.

7. Ram Chandra Paswan @ Ram Chandar Paswan, S/o Gonar Paswan.

8. Raj Kishor Paswan, S/o Rajendra Paswan. All Residents of VillageKothbanna, P.S. Bahera, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ganesh Chandra Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sakir Ahmad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 21-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in Bahera P.S. Case No.82 of 2017 instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 452, 341, 323, 324, 307, 380, 354 B, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.8, Raj Kishor Paswan, has been arrested. In such view of the matter, this application as against petitioner no.8, Raj Kishor Paswan has been rendered

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32980 of 2017 (2) dt.21-07-2017 infructuous. It is accordingly dismissed as against him. From the First Information Report it appears that there was dispute amongst children but later on it has taken big shape. All the accused persons including the petitioners have entered into the house of the informant and assaulted him and his family members. They also outraged the modesty of daughter-in-law of the informant In such view of the matter, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail. Accordingly the prayer for bail is rejected. However, if the petitioners surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks, the court below will pass an order on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order passed by this Court. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U T