Arbind Mahto And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.32758 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -154 Year- 2017 Thana -CHAUSA District- MADHEPURA ======================================================
1. Arbind Mahto, son of Deban Mahto,
2. Rabin Mahto @ Ravin Mahto, son of Deban Mahto, both resident of village- Fulaut, P.S.- Chausa (Fulaut O.P.), District- Madhepura. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 3/ 24-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Chausa (Fulaut OP) P.S. Case No.154 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 447, 341, 323, 354, 307, 504, 506/34 Indian Penal Code.
It is alleged that on account of quarrel between the children the petitioners along with other accused persons after forming unlawful assembly assaulted the informant, her husband and daughter. It is further alleged that daughter of the informant, Chaahat, sustained bleeding injury.
Injury Report of daughter of the informant, Chaahat, is annexed as Annexure-2, which shows that she sustained simple injury on her person. There is no repetition of blow.
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.32758 of 2017 (3) dt.24-08-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Chausa (Fulaut OP) P.S. Case No.154 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Uda Kishunganj, Madhepura, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.
with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.
(Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T