Amir Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.14059 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -667 Year- 2015 Thana -LAKHISARAI District- LAKHISARAI ============================================== Amir Kumar S/o Garib Ram R/o Village- Gosai Tola (Kuil), P.S. and District- Lakhisarai.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajnish Chandra, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. S. Eheteshmuddin, APP. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 12-05-2016 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 667 of 2015 registered for the offence punishable under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, three unknown miscreants after entering into the room of the informant and having pistol in hand opened godrej almirah after taking key from the informant and took away 10 bhar gold and cash of Rs. 8,50,000/- and further took away the mobile.

During the investigation, the name of the petitioner transpired on the basis of call detail and the petitioner was apprehended and he confessed his guilt.

Submission is of false implication and that nothing

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.14059 of 2016 (3) dt.12-05-2016 2/2 has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner, the petitioner is in custody since 11.11.2015 but he has not been put on T.I.P. and without legal and tangible material, charge sheet has been submitted.

Learned APP submits that the petitioner has tried to use the looted mobile after inserting SIM. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakhisarai in connection with Lakhisarai P.S. Case No. 667 of 2015, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Mishra/- U T