← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7977/2016disposed

Sheoji Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-09-06Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7977 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Sheoji Singh S/o Late Sonadhari Singh, resident of village and PostBampali, P.S.- Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur

2. Most Kanti Kuer, wife of Late Kamta Singh, resident of village and PostBampali, P.S.- Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Chairman, Bihar Land Tribunal, P.S.- Sachivalaya, Distt. Patna

3. The Member Administrative, Bihar Land Tribunal, P.S.- Sachivalaya, Dist.- Patna

4. The Director Consolidation, Bihar, Patna

5. Kesho Singh, S/o Late Satyanarayan Singh, resident of village and PostBampali, P.S.- Udwantnagar, District- Bhojpur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Nandan Prasad, Adv. For Respondent No. 5 : Mr. Shashi Chandra Pandey, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 06-09-2017 Heard learned counsel Sri Raj Nandan Prasad, appearing for the petitioners as well as learned counsel Sri Shashi Chandra Pandey, appearing for respondent no. 5. Also heard learned counsel for the State.

At the very outset, it is pointed out on behalf of the petitioners and respondent no. 5 that both parties have settled their dispute amicably outside the court and a compromise petition has been filed which is Annexure-1 to I.A. No. 5751 of 2017 and, therefore, in the aforesaid circumstance, this petition may be disposed of in the light of Annexure-1 to I.A. No. 5751 of 2017.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7977 of 2016 (3) dt.06-09-2017 2/2 The dispute of the present case appears to be between the petitioners and respondent no. 5 and admittedly, both the above stated parties have settled their dispute amicably. Therefore, in the aforesaid circumstance, this writ petition stands disposed of in the light of Annexure-1(compromise petition) annexed to I.A. No. 5751 of 2017.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U