Dhiraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.28278 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -12 Year- 2018 Thana -MANSI District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Dhiraj Kumar Son of Kare Paswan Resident of Village- Jhaua Bahiyar, P.S. Bariyarpur, District Munger.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 366(A) and 34 of the Indian Penal Code in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 12/2018.

Allegation against the petitioner is of abducting the daughter of the informant.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the statement of the victim girl under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. itself shows that the main allegation is against other coaccused and not against the petitioner, rather he has cooperated the victim girl.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.28278 of 2018 (2) dt.17-05-2018 2/2 Heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor also who has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail on the ground that the hand of the petitioner also transpires in this case. In view of the aforesaid facts and the statement of the victim under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C., I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

If the petitioner surrenders before the court below and prays for regular bail, his prayer shall be considered on the merit of the case without being prejudiced by this order. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J.) Rakhi U T