Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9628/2017bail granted

Kabutari Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.9628 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -96 Year- 2015 Thana -KARJA District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================

1. Kabutari Devi, W/o late Chanar Paswan,

2. Suresh Paswan, S/o late Chanar Paswan, both resident of villageBarkagaon, Keshari Nagar, P.S.- Karja, Distt- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shishir Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Tapeshwar Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 4/ 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the State.

The Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Karja P.S. Case No.96 of 2015 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 304-B, 201/34 Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that the petitioners are the mother-in-law and brother-in-law of the deceased. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Karja P.S. Case No.96 of 2015, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.9628 of 2017 (4) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) JA/- U T