Hriday Prakash Gupta v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7033 of 2016 ====================================================== Hriday Prakash Gupta Son of Late Lakshman Prasad Gupta S-Block, 185 Dalmianagar, P.O.+P.S.- Dalmianagar, P.O.+P.S.- Dalmianagar, DistrictRohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director, Higher Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. Veer Kuwar Singh University, Ara through its Registrar.

5. The Vice-Chancellor, Veer Kuwar Singh University, Ara. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar Singhm, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vivek Prasad GP-18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 02-05-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State as also the University. The petitioner has filed the present writ application for a direction to the respondents to re-designate the petitioner as Director, Physical Education in place of P.T.I. and grant revised pay scale with effect from 28.06.1991 and other ancillary reliefs . Learned counsel for the University submits that the University is contemplating to take final decision in the matter. In fact the claim of the petitioner and others has to be placed before the Syndicate and the Pay Fixation Committee and after decision of the Syndicate and Pay Fixation Committee, the University will take final decision on the grievance of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.7033 of 2016 dt.02-05-2018 2/2 In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with an observation that the University will place the case of the petitioner before the Syndicate at the earliest preferably within two months from today which will take decision with regard to entitlement of the petitioner. In case the University admits the claim of the petitioner, necessary consequential order should be passed by the University extending the benefit to the petitioner. In the even decision of the University goes against the petitioner, liberty shall be available to the petitioner to challenge the same in accordance with law.

With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 2.6.2018 Transmission Date