Md. Rasid And ORS v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43598 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -15 Year- 2018 Thana -DAGARUA District- PURNIA ======================================================

1. Md. Rasid son of Md. Tajamul

2. Md. Akhtar son of Md. Rasid

3. Bibi Amna alias Amia wife of Md. Rasid

4. Md. Kaushar alias Md. Kaiser son of Md. Belal alias Kalim

5. Md. Matin son of Md. Kalim All residents of village Fulpur, P.S. Dagarua, District Purnea.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ram Prawesh Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Bharat Lal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2018 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Dagarua P.S. Case No. 15 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, 307, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioners is assaulting one Moin by Bhala, Lathi and Danda causing injury.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is case and counter case and although it is alleged that petitioners assaulted one Moin, but the injuries caused to him was found to be simple in nature .

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the above facts, let the petitioners above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of six weeks from

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43598 of 2018 (3) dt.27-07-2018 2/2 the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bond of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Purnea, in connection with Dagarua P.S. Case No. 15 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C, as well as subject to the following conditions, it is further subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(ii) The petitioners shall cooperate in the investigation and make themselves available as and when required by the police and on the event of failure on their part to appear before the police on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of their bail bonds.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/Amjad/- U T