Pradeep Kumar Thakur @ Pranav Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61051 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-261 Year-2020 Thana- WARISNAGAR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

PRADEEP KUMAR THAKUR @ PRANAV THAKUR Son of Late Harihar Prasad Thakur @ Late Harihar Thakur R/O Village- Kusaiya, P.S- Warisnagar, District- Samastipur 2.

Arun Kumar Thakur @ Shambhu Thakur Son of Late Harihar Prasad Thakur @ Late Harihar Thakur R/O Village- Kusaiya, P.S- Warisnagar, DistrictSamastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjan Kumar, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr.Kalyan Shankar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 10-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 325, 307, 354, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the allegation against petitioner no.1 is that he with an intention to kill the brother of informant, assaulted with iron rod on his head, hand and legs, causing injury and petitioner no.2 is said to have assaulted with sword. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. They have been falsely implicated in this case. No such occur-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61051 of 2022(2) dt.10-01-2023 2/2 rence as alleged ever took place. There is admitted land dispute between the parties. The allegation levelled against the petitioners false and baseless. Both sides have filed cases against each other. Both sides have sustained grievous injuries. Petitioners have one criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, since both sides have sustained injuries, let the above named petitioners, be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Warsinagar P.S. Case No. 261 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T