← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45977/2018bail granted

Sanjay Yadav And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-08Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.45977 of 2018 Arising out of P.S. Case No.-46 Year-2018 Thana- GOH District- Aurangabad ======================================================

1. Sanjay Yadav, S/o Kapil Yadav,

2. Ranjay Yadav, S/o Kapil Yadav, Both resident of Village- Pakari, P.S.- Goh, District- Aurangabad (Bihar).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranjit Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Anurag Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 46 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and other family members. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioners and there is a case and counter case between the parties and land dispute in between them and the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.45977 of 2018(2) dt.08-08-2018 2/2 circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named, on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Daudnagar, District Aurangabad, in connection with Goh P.S. Case No. 46 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudha/-sunil U T