Patna High CourtCR. MISC./53746/2013disposed

Raghunandan Bhagat And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-07-192 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53746 of 2013 (4) dt.19-07-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53746 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1731 Year- 2013 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Raghunandan Bhagat Son Of Late Ruplal Bhagat Resident Of Village - Raghunathpur North Ward No.10, Police Station - Bhargama, District - Araria

2. Lalmuni Devi Wife Of Raghunandan Bhagat Resident Of Village - Raghunathpur North Ward No.10, Police Station - Bhargama, District - Araria

3. Kishore Bhagat Son Of Raghunandan Bhagat Resident Of Village - Raghunathpur North Ward No.10, Police Station - Bhargama, District - Araria

4. Awadhesh Bhagat Son Of Raghunandan Bhagat Resident Of Village - Raghunathpur North Ward No.10, Police Station - Bhargama, District - Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Bishundeo Bhagat Son Of Satya Narayan Bhagat Resident Of Village - Raghunathpur North Ward No.10, Police Station - Bhargama, District - Araria .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Amit Kr. Rakesh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-07-2017 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners to press this application. Earlier on 04.07.2017 also, nobody appeared on behalf of the petitioners to press this application. From perusal of the office note, it also appears that though notice was order to be issued vide order dated 26.04.2017 but till date requisites, thereof, could not be filed on behalf of the petitioner.

In such situation, since the matter is of 2013 and no

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53746 of 2013 (4) dt.19-07-2017 representation on behalf of the petitioner being made, this criminal miscellaneous application is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T