Sadhna Singh And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.42097 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -149 Year- 2016 Thana -JHAJHA District- JAMUI ======================================================
1. Sadhna Singh, Wife of Late Krishna Nandan Singh, Resident of Teacher Colony, Jhajha, P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui.
2. Gautam Krishna, Son of Late Krishna Nandan Singh, Resident of Teacher Colony, Jhajha, P.S.- Jhajha, District- Jamui. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Rita Verma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Jhajha P.S. Case No. 149 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 304(B), 201, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that petitioner No. 1 is mother-in-law and petitioner No. 2 is Bhainsur of the deceased. It has been submitted that after completion of investigation, police submitted charge sheet against the petitioners. From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.42097 of 2017 (2) dt.13-09-2017 2/2 surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today, in connection with Jhajha P.S. Case No. 149 of 2016, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Jamui, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T