Bablu @ Bablu Yadav @ Chhotu Yadav @ Chhotu v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.27428 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -48 Year- 2015 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Bablu @ Bablu Yadav @ Chhotu Yadav @ Chhotu, son of late Rangila Yadav, resident of Village- Karisath Police Station Udwant Nagar, District Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Rinku Devi, wife of Bablu @ Bablu Yadav @ Chhotu Yadav D/o Satya Narayan Yadav, resident of Village- Karisath Police Station Udwant Nagar, District Bhojpur. At present resident of Dewadi Post Office Bashantpur, P.S. Muffassil Ara District - Bhojpur.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Makardhwaj Upadhyay, Advocate For the State : APP For O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocates ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 31-03-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State assisted by learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest for the offences alleged under Sections 379, 406 and 498A read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act registered in connection with Mahila P.S. Case No. 48 of 2015.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and this is the first such grievance raised since the parties were married five year ago. The petitioner expresses his

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.27428 of 2015 (4) dt.31-03-2016 2/2 willingness to keep the opposite party no. 2 with due dignity and honour.

4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 appears and also expresses willingness on her part to accompany with the petitioner if she is kept properly.

5. Pursuant to order dated 09.03.2016, both parties are personally present and agree that they would be leaving the Court premises together, reiterating their commitment to resume their conjugal life in harmonious manner.

6. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner by order dated 23.07.2015 stands confirmed. However, in case a fresh complaint/F.I.R. of similar nature is filed by the opposite party no. 2 against the petitioner at any time prior to conclusion of the trial, the anticipatory bail granted to the petitioner shall stand automatically cancelled. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U T