Sunil Kumar Roy @ Sunil Roy v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.87 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-31 Year-2021 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Darbhanga ====================================================== Sunil Kumar Roy @ Sunil Roy Son of Shiv Nandan Roy Resident of VillageNaruar, P.S.- Bhairavsthan, District- Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Baleshwar Kamat For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramesh Chandra ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-11-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The petitioner, husband of Opposite Party No. 2 apprehends his arrest in Mahila (Darbhanga) P.S. Case No. 31 of 2021 registered for the offence under Section 498(A) and other allied sections of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that at this juncture, the petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3,500/- (three thousand five hundred) per month, starting from this month to Opposite Party No. 2.

In view of the undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give maintenance amount of Rs. 3,500/- (three thousand five hundred) per month, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, let the petitioner above-named be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.87 of 2022(4) dt.10-11-2022 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with Mahila (Darbhanga) P.S. Case No. 31 of 2021 on the following conditions:

(1.) Opposite Party No. 2 would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her saving bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.

(2.) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the saving bank account of the Opposite Party No. 2.

(3.) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond.

(4.) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(5.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

(6.) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings.

The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T