Ajmal Akhtar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62792 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-468 Year-2025 Thana- SASARAM NAGAR District- Rohtas ====================================================== Ajmal Akhtar S/o Late Abdul Rahman R/o Chaukhandi, P.S.- Sasaram (T), Distt- Rohtas , Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Aryan Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Bhanu Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. SONI SHRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 12-12-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 316(2) and 111 of the B.N.S.

3. Allegation in the first information report is that some unknown persons having formed an organized hang were targeting the passengers coming out of the Railway station, alluring them in talks and cheating them after showing some duplicate gold jewellery.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it would be apparent from the First Information Report itself that the petitioner is one of the persons who was arrested on the spot but as a matter of fact, no incriminating article was recovered from his conscious possession rather the recovery was made

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62792 of 2025(4) dt.12-12-2025 2/2 from co-accused Jai Kumar, who has already been granted bail by a coordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 24.09.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 66012 of 2025. The petitioner is in custody since 18.06.2025 and has one criminal antecedent which is related to electricity theft and not of similar nature.

5. Learned APP for the State has opposed the application for bail.

6. Taking into consideration the facts and circumstances and also considering the fact that no recovery was made from his possession coupled with the fact that the similarly situated co-accused has already been granted bail by coordinate Bench of this Court, let the above named petitioner, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Sasaram (T) P.S. Case No. 468 of 2025.

(Soni Shrivastava, J) devendra/- U T