Siya Ram Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70099 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-3 Year-2024 Thana- DIDARGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

Siya Ram Singh Son of Baijnath Singh Resident of Village - Kon Kathiyan, P.S. - Didarganj, District - Patna 2.

Vikash Singh @ Vikash Kumar Singh Son of Baijnath Singh Resident of Village - Kon Kathiyan, P.S. - Didarganj, District - Patna ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shyamal Prakash For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 18-12-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 447, 341, 354, 307, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that though at Para-3 of the anticipatory bail application, it has been pleaded that petitioners have antecedent of three cases, but then petitioners have annexed the FIRs of Didarganj P.S. Case No. 105 of 2020 and Didarganj P.S. Case No. 68 of 2024 and from perusal of the same, it would manifest that petitioners are not named in those FIRs and in Didarganj P.S. Case No. 14 of 2020, the petitioners were acquitted. It is next submitted that the informant alleges that accused persons including the petitioners assaulted causing injury on his head and behaved inappropriately with

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70099 of 2024(3) dt.18-12-2024 2/2 female members of the house.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., it would manifest that the allegations are general and omnibus in nature i.e. there is no specific allegation of assault and allegation of misbehaving is also not specific, further the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Didarganj P.S. Case No. 03 of 2024 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T