Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29881/2015rejected

Bhado Mandal @ Sunil Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

2015-10-27Mr. Justice Hemant Kumar Srivastava2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29881 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -57 Year- 2014 Thana -NATHNAGAR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Bhado Mandal @ Sunil Mandal Son of Suresh Mandal Resident of village - Chhoti Mohanpur, P.S. Akchari, ( Pirpainti ) District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Janki Nandan Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Zainul Abedin (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 27-10-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioner happens to be husband of the victim and there is allegation that petitioner used to torture the victim due to non-fulfilment of illegal demand. The victim was found missing and after that informant lodged the present case. In course of investigation, petitioner was arrested and made his confessional statement narrating the manner in which the victim was killed. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and hence, his prayer for bail in connection with Nathnagar P.S. Case No. 57 of 2014 pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur stands rejected, at

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29881 of 2015 (3) dt.27-10-2015 2/2 least, at this stage.

However, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhagalpur is directed to commit the case of the petitioner to the court of Sessions in accordance with law within three weeks from the date of receipt/production of copy of this order, if the same has not been committed as yet and after commitment, the trial court should expedite the trial of the petitioner.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T