Kailash Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.35407 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -481 Year- 2016 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Kailash Yadav, S/o Ram Kishun Yadav, Resident of Village- Raghopur, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Gita Devi, W/o Kailash Yadav, D/o Buddhu Yadav, Resident of VillageKupari, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Prasad Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Rajesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

This application for grant of anticipatory bail arises out of Complaint Case No. 481C of 2016, disclosing offence under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is the husband of the complainant. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to keep the complainant with full honour, love and dignity.

It is evident from the materials on record that matrimonial discord between them is the root cause for registration of the First Information Report. No purpose will be served, if the petitioner is taken into custody.

It is submitted that the petitioner shall present himself before the police as and when required and there is no chance that he will tamper with the evidence or influence the witnesses. Considering the nature of accusation and submissions advanced on behalf of the petitioner, this application is allowed. Let the petitioner above named in the event of his arrest/surrender within six weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria in Complaint case No. 481C of 2016, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

This is subject to the condition that the petitioner shall present himself before the Police/Court, as the case may be, as and when required and in the event of failure on his part to appear before the Court on two consecutive occasions, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled.

(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) ArunKumar/- U