Kaisar Miya @ Kausar Ansari @ Kaishun Miya @ Kaishar Miya v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62910 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-410 Year-2024 Thana- KALYANPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== Kaisar Miya @ Kausar Ansari @ Kaishun Miya @ Kaishar Miya S/o- Anwar Miya @ Anwar Ansari R/o Village- Medan Sirisiya PS - Kalyanpur DistrictEast Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Dhanmanti Devi W/o- Mukesh Mahto R/o- Medan Sirisiya W. No- 8, PS - Kalyanpur Dist. - East Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate Mr. Sumit Kumar, Advocate For the State :

Ms. Shaheen Begum, A.P.P.

For the Informant :

Mr. Suraj Kumar Tiwari, Advocate Mr. Akshay Tripathi, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 25-02-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 137 and 96 of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and is in custody since 06.03.2025 and in sum and substance, the allegation is that petitioner kidnapped the minor daughter of the informant. It is further submitted that petitioner and victim were in love and they had eloped. It is next submitted that victim has come back

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62910 of 2025(3) dt.25-02-2026 2/2 and her statement has been recorded under Section 183 BNSS wherein she has supported the case of the prosecution but then the said statement was made under parental pressure. It is also submitted that subsequently on intervention of the well-wishers, the parties have compromised the case knowing that victim and petitioner were in love.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposed the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant does not dispute the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and fairly submits that the parties have compromised the case.

5. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court where the case is pending in connection with Kalyanpur P.S. Case No. 410 of 2024.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T