Hiralal Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.34351 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -65 Year- 2017 Thana -HARSIDHI DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================
1. Hiralal Sah, Son of Chaturi Sah,
2. Sunarpati Devi, Wife of Hiralal Sah,
3. Deepak Sah, Son of Heera Sah,
4. Usha Devi, Wife of Sonu Sah, All resident of Village- Bhada, P.S.- Harsidhi, District- East Champaran.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ansul For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Harsidhi P.S. Case No. 65 of 2017 registered under Sections 323, 325, 307, 341, 379 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the Police during the course of investigation came to the conclusion that sections 307 and 325 were not made out against the petitioners and accordingly, they were enlarged on Police Bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.34351 of 2017 (2) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 and the rival submissions of the parties, since admittedly the petitioner was on Police Bail and has not misused the privilege of bail, it is directed that if the petitioners appear in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and make a prayer for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of the on its own merit in the light of the observations made in the case of Mahendra Prasad Singh Vs. State of Bihar, reported in 2004(3) PLJR, 491.
With the above direction/observation, this application is disposed of.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) Shailendra/- U T