Patna High CourtCWJC/8868/2016dismissed

Ranjeet Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS

2017-02-02Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8868 of 2016 ===========================================================

1. Ranjeet Kumar son of Parmeshwar Ram, reisdent of Village- Samsara, P.O. Sadisopur, P.S. Bihta, and District- Patna.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The Union of India through General Manager (P), East Coast Raiway, Waltair.

2. The Senior Divisional Personnel Officer, East Coast Railway, Waltair.

3. The Senior Divisional Electrical Engineer (OP/ VSKP), Divisional Railway Manager office Complex, Daandaparthy, Visakapatnam -530004.

4. The Chief Personnel Officer, Rail Sadan, Chadrashekharpur, Bhubaneshwar.

5. The Assistant Personnel Officer (Rectt.) Rail Sadan, Chandrashekharpur, Bhubneshwar.

6. The Divisional Railway Manager (P), East Coast Railway, Waltair.

7. The Chairman Railway Recruitment Board, Secunderabad. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Alok Kumar Sinha, Sr. Advocate & Mr. Shakib Ayaz For the Respondent/s : Mr. D. K. Sinha, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Naresh Dixit.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 02-02-2017 Heard learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.

The Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna has committed no wrong in dismissing the O.A. application of the petitioner vide order dated 11th February, 2016 passed in O.A. No. 142 of 2016.

In this case the recruitment Board is located at

Patna High Court CWJC No.8868 of 2016 dt.02-02-2017 2/2 Secunderabad. Merely because the petitioner is a resident of Bihar, it will not give him advantage of challenging any decision in the Central Administrative Tribunal, Patna Bench, Patna. If the Tribunal has taken a consistent view that the jurisdiction where the Selection Commission is functioning, shall be applied where the cause of action shall be considered, no interference is warranted with such order. This writ application is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Amin/- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date Transmission Date