Munni Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.777 of 2014 =========================================================== Munni Devi, wife of Shri Satyendra Singh P.O.- Karjain, Block- Raghopur, District- Supaul .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna

2. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar, Patna

3. The Director, Integrated Child Development Scheme (I.C.D.S.), Bihar, Patna

4. The Commissioner, Koshi Division, Saharsa

5. The District Magistrate, Supaul

6. The District Programme Officer, Supaul

7. The Child Development Project Officer, Raghopur, District- Supaul .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. AMRIT ABHIJAT For the Respondent/s : Mr. MANISH KUMAR, GP 8 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 09-03-2015 A K Tripathi, J.

The explanation offered by the petitioner has been considered right up till the Divisional Commissioner, the appellate authority, dealing with such matter. The nicety of the submission with regard to the evidence so urged, pleaded and appreciated is not required to be gone into by this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, especially when it is not a case of violation of any principle of natural justice, based on which the decision to remove the petitioner for serious omission in running of the centre has been taken.

2. Petitioner is not holder of a civil post or a constitutional post or any post as such under the State. If there is no violation of the basic principle of natural justice, the Court is not required to sit in super appeal over the adjudication so made.

Patna High Court CWJC No.777 of 2014 dt.09-03-2015 2 / 2

3. Writ application has no merit. It is dismissed.

4. Cost of Rs.2000/- by way of draft has been handed over to the counsel representing the petitioner as directed by the Court for payment by the respondent officials for their failure to complete the pleadings in time. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) R.K.Pathak/- U