Most. Siyapati Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.8439 of 2016 ====================================================== Most. Siyapati Devi wife of Late Pragash Singh Resident of VillageMahuli, P.O. Kothiya, PS Didarganj, District Patna. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Human Resources Department , New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.
2. The Accountant General Bihar, Patna.
3. The Administrator Cum Commissioner Patna Municipal Corporation Patna.
4. The Executive Officer Patna City Anchal , Patna Municipal Corporation Patna.
5. The District Magistrate, Patna.
6. The Treasury Officer, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None For the Respondent/s : Mr. Harish Kumar, GP 8 For Patna Municipal Corporation : Mr. Sanjay PrakashVErma For Accountant General : Mr. Manish Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V. NATH ORAL ORDER 17-09-2016 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioner when the matter has been called out. Learned Counsel on behalf of the respondent Patna Municipal Corporation is present. This writ application has been filed complaining that the petitioner, who is the widow of an employee of the Patna Municipal Corporation, has not been paid the family pension. It has been also evident from Annexure 5 that a petition in this regard has been filed by the petitioner before the Executive Engineer. Learned Counsel for the Corporation has taken a fair stand that if the petitioner would be entitled to the family pension and other benefits the same would be paid to her in accordance with law
Patna High Court CWJC No.8439 of 2016 (2) dt.17-09-2016 without any further delay.
Accordingly, this writ application is disposed of with a direction to respondent Nos. 3 and 4 to pass appropriate order for payment of admissible dues to the petitioner in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible and preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order. (V. Nath, J.) Snkumar/- U