← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/21353/2021dismissed

Kiran Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-04-03Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21353 of 2021 ====================================================== Kiran Kumari Wife of Sri Lal Bahadur Sah, resident of Village and P.O. - Gadha, P.S.- Ladania, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Social Welfare Department, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Director Integrated Child Development Services, Bihar, Patna. 3.

The Divisional Commissioner, Darbhanga Division, Darbhanga. 4.

The District Magistrate, Madhubani.

5.

The District Programme Officer (I.C.D.S.), Madhubani. 6.

The Child Development Project Officer, Ladania, District - Madhubani. 7.

The Lady Supervisor, C.D.P.O. Project, Ladania, District - Madhubani. 8.

Binita Kumari, wife of Uday Narain Pandit, resident of Godha, P.S.- Ladania, District - Madhubani.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ratanakar Jha, Advocate For the State :

Mr.S.K. Mandal (Sc3) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 03-04-2024 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the following reliefs:- "(i) To issue an appropriate order/s, direction/s including a writ preferably in the of nature mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner for the post Anganwari Sevika in the abovementioned centre No.138 lies in Panchayat Raj Balahi under to Ladania Block of District- Madhubani as such her name appears at serial No.1 in the merit list.

Patna High Court CWJC No.21353 of 2021(2) dt.03-04-2024 2/2 (ii) To direct the respondent No.5 and 6 to enquire into the matter of irregularity committed by concerned respondents in the matter of Sevika in the abovementioned centre and take appropriate legal action against them."

2.

At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks not to press the present writ petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such other alternative remedies as are otherwise available under the law, including that of filing a civil suit before the learned civil court of competent jurisdiction. Liberty, so sought, is granted.

3.

The writ petition stands dismissed as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) kanchan/- U