Suparna Das Bhaumik @ Supurna Das Bhaumik And ORS v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.23801 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -152 Year- 2015 Thana -KAJI MUHAMMADPUR DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. SUPARNA DAS BHAUMIK @ SUPURNA DAS BHAUMIK W/o Sanjay Bhaumik Resident of Village- Sitagram PO & PS- Raiganj District Dinajpur (West Bengal)
2. Dilip Kumar Bhaumik s/o Sachindra Chandra Bhaumik Resident of Village- Sitagram PO & PS- Raiganj District Dinajpur (West Bengal)
3. Sanjay Bhaumik S/o Dilip Kumar Bhaumik Resident of VillageSitagram PO & PS- Raiganj District Dinajpur (West Bengal) .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Bihar State food and Civil Supplies corporation Ltd Patna. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vivek Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Navin Kumar Pandey (App) For the E.O.U : Mr. Vishwanath Pd. Singh For B.S.F.C. : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-03-2017 The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Kazimohamadpur P.S. Case No. 152 of 2015, registered for offences punishable under Sections 409 and 420 of the Indian Penal Code.
From perusal of the order-sheet, it appears that earlier some directions were issued to the petitioners for depositing the amount as he had undertaken to deposit the same, however no amount has been deposited. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that he has no instruction with regard to compliance
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.23801 of 2016 (12) dt.06-03-2017 2/2 of the direction issued by this Court.
Heard learned senior counsel for the E.O.U as well as learned counsel for the B.S.F.C.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail, it is, accordingly, rejected. However, petitioners may surrender and pray for regular bail before the court below itself, and if any such application is filed, the same will be considered by the court below on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T