Pradeshi Manjhi @ Pardeshi Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.67479 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2022 Thana- ARIYARI District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Pradeshi Manjhi @ Pardeshi Manjhi Son Of Bhola Manjhi Village- Barsha, Ps- Ariyari (Kasar), Dist- Sheikhpura.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Bipin Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 31-10-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 354B, 504, and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The allegation against the petitioner along with others is of assaulting the informant and her family members, due to which they sustained injury.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to old dispute. He has committed no offence. He submitted that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. There is a case and counter case between the parties. Members of both

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.67479 of 2023(2) dt.31-10-2023 2/2 parties have sustained injury as alleged in a separate occurrence. He further submitted that the others co-accused have already been granted bail by a Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 30.05.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 16925 of 2023. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of the bail petition. He is languishing in judicial custody since 01.07.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of custody, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate1st Class, Sheikhpura in connection with Ariyari P.S. Case No. 301 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Arish/- U T