Patna High CourtCR. WJC/523/2016withdrawn

Md. Sakir Hussain v. The State Of Bihar Through Its Chief Secretary, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna And ORS

2016-08-04The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.523 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Md. Sakir Hussain S/o Yakub Miya, Resident of village - Kharjama, P.O. Mahnar, District - Vaishali, Presently Danapur Cantt, P.S. Rupaspur, Distt. - Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. The Senior Superintendent of Police, North Gandhi Maidan, Patna

4. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Danapur, Patna

5. The Sub - Divisional Police Officer, Danapur, Patna

6. Binod Yadav, Officer-in-Charge, Rupaspur Police Station, Danapur, Patna, District Patna

7. Mr. Ashok Kumar, S.I. Rupaspur Police Station, Danapur Patna, District Patna

8. Rajesh Kumar Singh, ASI, Rupaspur Police Station, Danapur, Patna, District Patna

9. Ramdeo Rai S/o Late Sita Ram Rai

10. Dharmendra Rai S/o Ramdeo Rai

11. Sonu Kumar S/o Ramdeo Rai Respondent No.9,10, 11 are resident of Ambedkar Dental College Road, Jalalpur City, Ram Jaipal Nagar, P.S. Rupaspur, Distt. - Patna .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nand Lal Singh, Advocate Ms. Madhuri Lata, Adv.

For the Respondent/s : Ms. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL ORDER 04-08-2016 Heard Mr. Nand Lal Singh, learned Counsel for the petitioner, and Ms. Nutan Sahay, learned Assistant Counsel to Additional Advocate General No.12, appearing on behalf of the State-respondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to approach this Court

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.523 of 2016 (3) dt.04-08-2016 2/2 with appropriate application in future.

No objection has been raised to the prayer for withdrawal made by the petitioner.

In view of the above and in the interest of justice, the application is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach this Court with appropriate application, in future, if so advised, and/or take recourse to such provisions of law as may be permissible.

Mkr./- (I.A. Ansari,CJ) U