Patna High CourtCR. MISC./17240/2017bail granted

Sample Yadav v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-10-12Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.17240 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -208 Year- 2014 Thana -BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBUXAR ====================================================== Sample Yadav, son of Awadh Yadav, R/o vill-Barki Basauli, P.S. Buxar(Ind) Dist.- Buxar .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Bihar

2. Babita Devi daughter of Late Ramashish Yadav, resident of village Kaithi, P.S. Bageb Gola, Dist.- Buxar .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Mritunjay Kumar Nirala ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 12-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the Opposite Party No.2 and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest for the offence instituted under Section 498(A) of the Indian Penal Code and 4 of D.P. Act.

The allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture upon the victim due to non-fulfillment of the demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The case

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.17240 of 2017 (4) dt.12-10-2017 2/2 is triable by the Magistrate. Due to petty family dispute, the present case has been instituted against the petitioner. The petitioner has further relied upon the judgment of this court, in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182.

On behalf of the State and counsel for the Opposite Party No.2, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Complaint Case No.208(C) of 2014 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Buxar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Amit/- U T