Vishal Bharti Minor v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23464 of 2018 ====================================================== Vishal Bharti ( Minor ) S/o Anil Kumar Yadav, resident of Mohalla-Ram Bag, Near Hope Hospital, Purnea, P.S.-K. Hat, District-Purnea represented through his father and natural Guardian Anil Kumar Yadav S/o Ghanshyam Yadav of Ram Bag, Near Hope Hospital, Purnea, P.S.-K. Hat, District-Purnea. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through Defence Secretary, Ministry of Defence, Government of India, New Delhi.
2. The Sainik School Society through the Chairman of Executive Authority i.e. the Defence Secretary, Dwing Bhawan, New Delhi.
3. The Honorary Secretary, Sainik School Society Cell, Ministry of Defence, Rood No. 101, D-1 Wing Sena Bhawan, DHQ Post New Delhi-110011.
4. The General Officer, Commandign cum the Chariman of Local Board of Administration of Sainik School, Jharkhand and Sub-Area, Danapur Kantt, Danapur, Patna.
5. The Principal Sainik School, Gopalganj, Post-Hathua, District-Gopalganj.
6. The Vice Principal, Sainik School Gopalganj Post-Hathua, DistrictGopalganj. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Bhola Prasad Mr. Praveen Kumar Agrawal For the Respondent/s :
Mr. S.D Sanjay (Addl. Soc. Gen.) Mrs. Punam Kumari Singh, CGC ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL ORDER 06-12-2018 The petitioner seeks quashing of the letter dated 21.03.2018, issued by the Vice-President, Sainik School, Gopalganj, whereby father of the petitioner had been directed to apply for withdrawal of the petitioner from the School, in view of certain acts of indiscipline reported against him. This is not in dispute that the father of the petitioner, in pursuance of the said letter dated 21.03.2018, had applied for withdrawal of the petitioner from the said School. This
Patna High Court CWJC No.23464 of 2018(2) dt.06-12-2018 2/2 application has been filed nine months after the said letter. No direction at all can be given by this Court, in the facts and circumstances of the case.
This application is, accordingly, dismissed.
(Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Ashish/- U