Dinesh Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.37260 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -90 Year- 2017 Thana -ARIYARI District- SEKHPURA ======================================================

1. Dinesh Ram,

2. Uday Ram, Both son of late Damodar Ram, Resident of Village- Baruna, Police Station- Ariari, District- Sheikhpura. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bipin Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Bal Mukund Prasad Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 19-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Ariari P.S. Case No. 90 of 2017/ POCSO Case No. 17 of 2017 registered under Sections 363, 366A, 372 of the Indian Penal Code and 8 of POCSO Act.

Allegation against the petitioners is of kidnapping the daughter of the informant and there is other allegation against other accused persons.

Submission of learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is no specific allegation against the petitioners and further victim has now been married with one Dhiraj on 15.4.2017.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and in view of facts and

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.37260 of 2017 (2) dt.19-08-2017 2/2 circumstances, to my opinion, this is not a fit case for grant of anticipatory bail. Let petitioners surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail, which shall be considered on the basis of submission made above and the court below will pass an appropriate order, without being prejudiced by this order. With the above observation, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U